Tuesday, April 21, 2009
In Class Free Write
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
Unit 3 Proposal
In Class Bloggin'
Thursday, April 9, 2009
In Class Free Write
I believe that this information will be beneficial because I now understand how to make arguments in different ways. Say I wanted to appeal ethically to my reader; I could write in a different manner than if I wanted to create excitement. I believe that having read this information I can see how it is definitely going to help. One other aspect of the chapter's reading that I believe will help me is the portion about how arguments are not just words. I already understood this but I believe that this section will help me and my group to make an effective argument with a political cartoon or something of that nature. I think that this chapter will help our group and I will most likely be referring to this reading for guidance throughout this project.
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
My job
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
In Class Free Write
For an ideal group work situation, I would say that everyone has their own job while giving input into the other group member's work. Everyone should be here on time everyday, no exceptions! I think that if we assign each group member two or three jobs throughout the semester, this group assignment will go alot more smoothly than some of the other groups in this class. I also think that for this to be an ideal group situation, everyone in this group will have to be willing to meet outside of class if needed.
What are some of the different roles in the group?
I think that in this group we are going to need a group leader, a research team (two people), a leading writer, a gatekeeper, and a reporter. Group leaders are always necessary in group work because groups need guidance. The group leader should make schedules for the times in which we meet and should lead all discussion if needed. The research team is probably the most important part of the group because they will be finding information in which will be base our whole presentation and project on. The leading writer will be the one who explains and documents what our group is doing and where we are in the project. He or she will also write the final paper. The gatekeeper will be the one who will manage any problematic group members or situations that occur if our group begins to not function as we should. Finally, the reporter will document everything that we do everytime we meet.
In Class Free Write
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
In Class Free-Write: My Primary Sources
These three sources are different because they all look at different aspects of Rodriguez' steroid use. The first two primarily look at what drove Rodriguez to use steroids while the third looks at the people and players around him that possibly made him want to try and continually use steroids. The first article is by far the most benefical source that I have obtained for my second essay in this class. This article stands above the latter two sources because it goes more in-depth, looking at the ins and outs of steroids and how Rodriguez handled the steroid allegations. The first article is different from the other two because it was published in a Sports Illustrated by authors and writers who are very skilled in the field of performance-enhancing drugs in baseball.
The warrents or unspoken values and assumptions of these three sources are: Rodriguez knowingly used steroids to gain an edge, Rodriguez was pressured into using these drugs, and that Rodriguez only used steroids while he was in Texas. I believe that all three of these warrents can really help me in my paper. I think that each of these warrents can create great arguments. The first warrent is one the would most likely seem very obvious to outsiders. I believe that there is more to this warrent. After reading and researching many articles, it is a valid arguement that Rodriguez did not know what he was putting in his body. Some people honestly believe Rodriguez when he said that he was simply too young to know better.
These three articles definitely show the basic model for arguments in America. All three of these articles make a point and attempt to prove it. These articles also attempt to disprove someone or a group of people. After reading and analyzing these three articles I now have a pretty good idea as to what the state of argument is in the United States. I now think that most arguments in the US are made through using evidence and primary examples to prove or disprove point. In the US, it is evident to me now that arguments have two or more than two sides. I now realize that a good argument is not only one-sided. In attempting to prove or disprove, I now think that a rebuttal is a great way to make an argument.
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Unit 2 Proposal
For my Unit 2 proposal I am going to research and write about the Steroid Era in baseball. This is something that has always interested me because I come from a family who loves baseball and Instead of looking at a just the Steroid Era as a whole, I am going to look at a few players and how they tie into the Steroid Era and how they tie into the records of baseball. For example, when exactly Barry Bonds began using steroid and how many home runs he hit during the time of his use. This raises a good question, what would his statistics looked like if he had never used steroids. Other players that I am going to research because they caused so much controversy are Roger Clemens and Miguel Tejada. Clemens reported lied to Congress about his steroid use and Tejada has already been indicted for lying to Congress about his use. I may also take a look at the Alex Rodriguez case but I believe that Rodriguez may not be a good topic of research because his use has surfaced so recently. The fact that his use has surfaced so recently leads me to believe that there will be some sources that act whimsically in making judgments rather than gathering facts and statistics and writing reports with clear, thought-out research. I believe that researching this topic will be interesting because of how big the issue of steroids has gotten in baseball. I will look in baseball magazine, Sports Illustrated, and the Mitchell Report. This Mitchell Report is a paper written by a man named George Mitchell who has followed the issue of steroids since it first surfaced. In his paper he writes about specific players and their use of steroids. I believe that I will find a ton of great information in this paper because of how in-depth it goes. I am really looking forward to this because I am a baseball fan and would love to know the ins and outs of the Steroid Era in baseball.
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
3/3/09: Free Write
One thing that is not making me happy these days is my apartment and its management. There is early morning construction, cold water in the morning, and no cell phone service in my apartment. I can not wait until the end of school so I can move into the house that I am renting next semester. Not only does my apartment have all of these problems, it is over-priced and the management acts like it is not their position to help me out. At the going rate of this place, I should have a servant in my room.
You can not begin to think of how excited I am for spring break, I have been waiting on going on this fishing trip for months now. My dad and four other of his friends are heading down to Del Rio, Texas to go bass fishing at Lake Amistad. I love this area, it isn't exactly pretty but it is always fun.
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Thinking Rhetorically: 2/26/09
For my rhetorical analysis of a primary text I chose a computer animated image of Tiger Woods with a Nike swoosh as his smile. This can be viewed as a very loaded argument and most likely one that the people at Nike or Tigers Woods does not agree with. This argues that Tiger Woods is happy because of his big Nike contract and the money that he makes off of Nike. In doing further research of this image I found that this was an image made by a blogger who did not agree with the fact that Nike is using Tiger's stardom to lure people to a dinner that has not gotten a lot of coverage in the past. I understand that Nike is advertising their star but I do not agree with this blogger who says that Tiger is only there to attract. Tiger Woods is a role model to children, Nike should be allowed to use him to attract attention. Going back to Tiger's smile, I believe that this blogger is making the argument that Tiger is only smiling and acting happy because he has to be. I believe that this is a valid argument except for the fact that it is simply a computer animated image, it is a fictional image. This image does not reflect the true views of Tiger Woods or of Nike. From a rhetorical standpoint with ethos, pathos, and logos in mind, I think this image is a pretty good argument. Ethically, this appeals to the ethos because people would question that Tiger is involved with Nike for the money, not for the fact that Nike is an organization of charitable giving. Logically, this image argues that Tiger Woods is only thinking about the money. It is arguing that Tiger cares more about the money than what the company of Nike actually does. I believe that this is a semi-effective argument because it does bring up the point that some pro athletes do only care about the money and consequently, it affects their performance. I do not agree with this argument but I do respect it in the sense that it is attempting to bring up issues in pro athletics.
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
In Class Free Write: Rhetorical Thinking Unit 2
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Ethos, Pathos, and Logos of a Public Space
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
In Class: Analyzing Visuals
When I begin to look at the image as a whole I first see another little girl who is smaller in stature than the young girl smoking a cigarette. I believe that the other little girl may look up to the girl smoking and she looks disappointed. The second girl has her hands placed at her hips which could symbolize that the second girl is mad or in shock that her companion is resorting to smoking. As I try to look at the other parts of this image I find myself searching for another image to act as an answer as to why this picture is like it is. I can't seem to find an explanation.
I believe this image is about child tobacco use. I believe that this could be used at an ad campaign to stop child tobacco use. This image could have been taken to show to the public that there are children who are this young who smoke or use other tobacco products.
This image is intending to function as a message to inform. This is an argument to inform on the tobacco use in the world among children. This is a very effective image because the little girl looks young and people do not want to see their own children smoking or using tobacco products. This little girl serves as an example because she looks sad and this image could show how tobacco use could be a way out for some children.
